案例:某工程施工招标,投标截止时间前递交投标文件的投标人为投标人甲、投标人乙、投标人丙,招标人依法组织了开标。经评标委员会初步评审,投标人甲和投标人乙因递交的投标保证金未从基本账户汇入,评标委员会全体成员一致同意按招标文件约定做废标处理。投标人丙的投标文件中《规费税金项目清单与计算表》出现计算错误,计算基础和费率正确,但税金金额错误,且低于招标文件要求的税金计取标准,就此问题五名评标委员会成员产生了激烈的争论,其中四名成员认为应当视为算术性错 Case: bidding for a project construction bidding and submission of bidding documents before the deadline for bidding shall be bidder A, bidder B and bidder C. The tenderer has organized the bid opening according to law. Preliminary evaluation by the bid evaluation committee, Bidder A and Bidder B due to the tender deposit was not imported from the basic account, all members of the Bid Evaluation Committee agreed to do according to the tender documents agreed to do the bid processing. Tender C bid documents “fee tax items list and calculation sheet” calculation error, calculation basis and the rate is correct, but the amount of the tax error, and lower than the tax requirements of the tender documents, five questions on this issue There was a heated debate among the members of the benchmark committee, of whom four considered it to be considered arithmetic