论文部分内容阅读
今天的法哲学,已经告别了法律预先确定所有裁判这一严格意义上的司法三段论。为了使个案裁判不至流于法官的恣意,法律方法论和法律论证理论均致力于为合理裁判提供帮助。20世纪70年代以来,很多人主张在法律适用中,根据裁判的不同可能选项对社会的影响,选择对社会最有利的裁判,从而将裁判合理化。~([1])对这一脉络在理论上加以总结和深化,并为人广为引用的作品,
Today’s philosophy of law has bid farewell to the legal syndicate of justice in the strict sense that all the judgments of the law are predetermined. In order to make the case judge not wantonly to the judges, both legal methodology and legal argumentation theory are devoted to helping the reasonable judgment. Since 1970s, many people advocate that in the application of law, the referee should be rationalized according to the influence of different possible referees on society and the most favorable referee in society. ~ ([1]) in this context in theory to sum up and deepen, and is widely cited works,