论文部分内容阅读
【目的】基于不同文献类型,对信息科学与图书馆学期刊的5年影响因子(5IF)进行矫正,以期明确基于文献类型矫正影响因子在信息科学与图书馆学期刊中的应用价值。【方法】以SSCI信息科学与图书馆学30种期刊为研究对象,在分析文献类型的基础上,提出5种矫正5IF,传统5IF也由计算获得;将各刊的传统5IF、矫正5IF与总被引频次、2年影响因子、特征因子、SJR值、SNIP值做Spearman相关性分析。【结果】各矫正5IF与传统5IF在期刊评价中有较强的一致性,各矫正5IF之间也有强相关性;传统5IF和各矫正5IF与期刊其他各评价指标间均呈显著正相关,且相关系数差异很小。【结论】基于文献类型矫正影响因子的方法不建议应用于信息科学与图书馆学期刊。
【Objective】 Based on different types of literature, 5IF (5IF) of information science and library science journals was corrected in order to clarify the application value of influencing factors in information science and library science journals based on the types of documents. 【Method】 Based on SSCI information science and library science, 30 kinds of journals of SSCI were selected as research objects. Based on the analysis of the types of documents, 5 kinds of correction 5IF were proposed, and traditional 5IF was calculated. The traditional 5IF, 5IF and 5IF Cited frequency, 2-year impact factor, feature factor, SJR value, SNIP value Spearman correlation analysis. 【Results】 The results showed that there was a strong correlation between 5IF and traditional 5IF in evaluating journals, and there was a strong correlation between 5IF and 5IF. There was a significant positive correlation between traditional 5IF and other 5IF and other evaluation indexes The correlation coefficient difference is small. [Conclusion] The method of correcting influential factors based on the types of documents is not recommended for the journal of information science and library science.