论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较不同护理方法对新生儿颅内出血的影响。方法选取医院确诊颅内出血并接受治疗的120例患儿,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组60例。对照组采用常规护理方法进行护理,观察组则进行系统护理干预,比较2组患儿护理效果、并发症发生率及愈合率。结果观察组第1、2周测定行为能力(NBNA)评分不合格率分别为23.33%和13.33%,低于对照组的58.33%和28.33%(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率为20.00%,低于对照组的41.67%(P<0.05);观察组痊愈率为75.00%,高于对照组的23.33%(P<0.05)。结论在新生儿颅内出血护理中采取系统护理干预,有利于降低患儿并发症发生率,提高治愈率,适合临床推广。
Objective To compare the effects of different nursing methods on neonatal intracranial hemorrhage. Methods A total of 120 children with intracranial hemorrhage diagnosed in hospital were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was treated by routine nursing method while the observation group was treated with systematic nursing intervention. The nursing effect, complication rate and healing rate of the two groups were compared. Results The NBNA scores of the observation group were 23.33% and 13.33% at the first and second weeks, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (58.33% and 28.33%, P <0.05). The total complication rate in observation group was 20.00%, which was lower than that in control group (41.67%, P <0.05). The cure rate in observation group was 75.00%, which was higher than that in control group (23.33%, P <0.05). Conclusion Systemic nursing intervention in the treatment of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage is conducive to reduce the incidence of complications in children and improve the cure rate, suitable for clinical promotion.