论文部分内容阅读
本文将张湛《列子注》与《列子》原文认真加以对照，从大量例证中，看出张湛在《列子注》中所体现的思想与《列子》原文的思想差别很大；有的注文与原文没有丝毫关系甚至截然相反。张湛《列子注》《列子》原文在义理上即在思想上有这样大的矛盾，这是《列子》书不是张湛所伪造的强有力的内证。
In this paper, Zhang Zhan’s “Liezhiban” and “Liezizi” seriously compared with the original, from a large number of examples, we can see that Zhangzhan’s thought in Liezhiban differs greatly from the idea of Liezai. Some notes There is no difference or even the opposite of the original. Zhang Zhan “Liezi Note” “Liezi” The original text in the sense that there is such a big contradiction in ideology, which is “Liezi” book is not a powerful internal evidence faked by Zhang Zhan.