论文部分内容阅读
郭店楚墓竹简的出土及读解,使中国历史上几桩千年公案有望解决。如老子到底是谁,连司马迁也没弄清楚。竹简《老子》有着不同于今本的独特思想体系,且更为古老。因而可以推论竹简《老子》作者为春秋末期与孔于同时的老聃,而流传的《老子》是战国中期的太史儋在竹简本基础上篡改而成,《史记》中载骑青牛出函谷关、著《老子》五千言者,当为太史儋而非老子。竹简还为辨清两千多年来一直存在争议的“尧舜禅让”提供了依据。
Guodian Chu Tomb bamboo unearthed and read, so that several thousand years in Chinese history is expected to solve the case. As I who in the end, even Sima Qian did not figure out. Bamboo slips “Lao Tzu” has a unique ideology different from today’s, and is even more ancient. Therefore, it can be concluded that the author of Bamboo Slips “Lao Tzu” is the Lao Zi at the same time of the Spring and Autumn Period and Confucius, while the circulating “Lao Tzu” is a tampered Taishi in the middle of the Warring States Period. Gu Guan, the “Lao Tzu” five thousand speakers, when the Tai Shi Wei rather than I. Bamboo slips also provide a basis for discerning the controversial “Yao, Shun and Chan” that have been disputed for more than two thousand years.