论文部分内容阅读
分家析产是传统中国财产传递的主要模式,与西方的遗产继承是不相同的两种制度。清末民初引进西方法律时,外来的遗产继承与内生的分家析产发生交会,并有冲突与融合。本文以民初的大理院为研究对象,进行分家析产的司法审判实务的考察,以还原由大理院判例所构建的分家析产规则。自成文法而论,中国在此时期开始自传统的分家析产向近代的遗产继承演变,1931年的国民政府民法典完全实行基于个人主义的继承制度,根植于同居共财家庭的分家析产制度默默地退出国家法。但民初大理院仅仅将分家析产的法律与习惯体系化,并适度地采纳西方的法律精神,传统的分家析产制度并没有被近代的遗产继承制度所取代,反而因此延续了中国固有习惯及传统法律的生命力。
Separating families is the main mode of transfer of traditional Chinese property and is different from the inheritance of the West in the two systems. When the introduction of Western law from the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic to the early Republic of China, the inheritance of foreign heritage and the endogenous separation of births occurred at an intersection with conflicts and mergers. In this paper, the Daliyuan in the early years of the Republic of China as the research object, the investigation of the judicial trial of the separation of family property, in order to restore the Daliyuan case established separation rules. From the perspective of statutory law, China began to evolve from the inheritance of the traditional separatist property to the inheritance of the past. In 1931, the Civil Code of the Kuomintang government fully implemented the inheritance system based on individualism and the system of separation of families and property Silently withdraw from national law. However, in the early years of the Republic of China, the Daliyuan System systematized the law and practice of separation of family property and adopted the western legal spirit moderately. The traditional system of separation of family property was not replaced by the inheritance system of inheritance in modern times. Instead, it inherited the Chinese custom And the vitality of traditional law.