怎样诠释《为了忘却的记念》这一课题?从一些资料来看,或以“忘却”为反语了之;或以“忘却”后边省略了“悲哀”二字作罢。虽然都不能算错,但实在不能尽如人意,因为上述的解释往往脱离了课文,缺乏依据或说服力。我以为以紧扣课文的首自然段和课文的最后一部分来诠释课题为宜。先看看文章的开头一段。 How to interpret the topic of “Forget the Memory of the Forgotten?” From the perspective of some data, the “oblivion” is used as an irony; or the word “sadness” is omitted after “forget”. Although it can’t be wrong, it can’t be as good as it should be, because the above explanation is often out of the text, lacking in the basis or persuasion. I think it is appropriate to interpret the subject with the first paragraph of the text and the last part of the text. Take a look at the beginning of the article.