论文部分内容阅读
目的 :在对患牙进行口腔修复时选择不同的修复材料,并对其抗摩擦的效果进行观察并对比。方法 :选择174例在我院进行口腔修复的患者共计246颗牙齿,平均分为三组,分别应用金属、树脂以及陶瓷三种窝洞充填的材料对患牙进行修复,对临床的修复效果进行观察并对比。结果 :在完成修复6个月后,树脂组、陶瓷组以及金属组的成功率分别达到了92.7%、87.8%以及90.2%;在完成修复12个月后,树脂组为90.2%,高于金属组与陶瓷组的85.4%,但差异不明显(P>0.05)。结论 :三种修复材料均有着各自的优缺点,在临床中进行选择时可根据长远的效果,综合性功能以及患者的意愿进行选择。
OBJECTIVE: To select different repair materials for dental restoration of the affected teeth, and to observe and compare the anti-friction effect. Methods: One hundred and seventy-four patients undergoing oral repair in our hospital were enrolled in this study. A total of 246 teeth were divided into three groups. Metallic, resinous, and ceramic materials were used to repair the affected teeth. The clinical effect was evaluated Observe and contrast. RESULTS: After 6 months of repair, the success rates of resin group, ceramic group and metal group reached 92.7%, 87.8% and 90.2%, respectively. After 12 months of repair, the resin group was 90.2% higher than the metal group 85.4% of the group and the ceramic group, but the difference was not significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The three kinds of repair materials have their own advantages and disadvantages, in the clinical choice can be based on long-term results, comprehensive function and the wishes of patients to choose.