论文部分内容阅读
“辩证法不知道什么绝对分明的和固定不变的界限,不知道什么无条件的普遍有效的‘仁此即彼!’,它使固定的形而上学的差异互相过渡,除了‘非此即彼!’,又在适当的地方承认‘亦此亦彼!’”,恩格斯的这一论述本来是对辩证的思维方式的科学说明。但长期以来,人们却由此形成了一种偏见,把“非此即彼”的思维方式和形而上学思维方式搅在一起,认为在思维方式上,辩证法和形而上学的区别就在于是否承认“亦此亦彼”。这是片面的。为了澄清问题,本文就这两种思维方式的关系以及形而上学思维方式的特征作一下初步探讨。
“Dialectics does not know what is absolutely clear and fixed boundaries, do not know what is unconditionally common and effective ’benevolence’, it makes the difference between fixed metaphysics each other, except ’ And admitting ’in the right place, where appropriate!’ ”This essay by Engels would have been a scientific explanation of the dialectical way of thinking. For a long time, however, people formed a kind of prejudice, which mixed “non-equivalent” thinking with metaphysical thinking, thinking that in the way of thinking, the difference between dialectics and metaphysics lies in whether or not “ Also also ”. This is one-sided. In order to clarify the issue, this article discusses the relationship between these two modes of thinking and the characteristics of the metaphysical way of thinking.