目的:探讨军人应激反应与领悟社会支持、认知情绪调节的相关性。方法:随机整群抽取某部官兵1553例,采用领悟社会支持量表、认知情绪调节问卷中文版和军人急性应激反应量表对其进行测评,并分析军人应激反应与领悟社会支持、认知情绪调节的相关性。结果:某部官兵军人急性应激反应总分(9.01±6.94)分,其中心理应激反应(4.06±3.54)分,生理应激反应(4.94±4.00)分;社会支持总分(61.37±11.55)分,其中家庭外支持(40.31±8.28)分,家庭内支持(21.06±4.72)分;认知情绪调节策略总分(107.69±15.54)分,其中适应性情绪调节策略(65.39±10.04)分,非适应情绪调节策略(42.30±8.16)分。Pearson相关分析结果显示,军人应激反应与认知情绪调节策略呈非常显著正相关(P<0.01),与领悟社会支持呈非常显著负相关(P<0.01)。而适应性策略与应激反应各因子、家庭内支持与非适应性策略、家庭内支持与应激反应各因子间的相关性均属于低度相关(r均<0.2)。提示,非适应性策略、家庭外支持和应激反应三者间关系非常显著(P<0.01)。分层回归分析结果显示,认知情绪调节策略能解释军人应激反应方差变异的12.3%(△F=103.15)。其中,适应性策略对军人应激反应有非常显著负向预测作用(β=-0.06,P<0.01),非适应性策略对军人应激反应有非常显著正向预测作用(β=0.32,P<0.01)。领悟社会支持能解释军人应激反应方差变异的6.6%(△F=51.63)。其中家庭外支持对军人应激反应具有非常显著负向预测作用(β=-0.22,P<0.01)。中介效应分析结果显示,中介效应占总效应比例的18.6%。适应性策略通过领悟社会支持间接影响军人的应激反应。结论:军人应激反应与领悟社会支持、认知情绪调节策略显著相关,非适应性策略通过领悟社会支持影响军人的应激反应。 Objective: To explore the correlation between military stress response and perceived social support and cognitive emotion regulation. Methods: A total of 1553 officers and men of a certain department were randomly selected from a group. The Chinese version of Perceived Social Support Questionnaire, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and Military Acute Respiratory Response Scale were used to evaluate the stress response and perceived social support. Relevance of Cognitive Emotion Regulation. Results: The total score of acute stress response of officers and soldiers was (9.01 ± 6.94), which was 4.06 ± 3.54 and 4.94 ± 4.00 respectively. The score of social support was 61.37 ± 11.55 ), With 40.31 ± 8.28 points for out-of-home support and 21.06 ± 4.72 points for in-home support, and 107.69 ± 15.54 points for cognitive emotion adjustment strategy. Among them, the adaptive emotion regulation strategy was 65.39 ± 10.04 , Non-adaptive emotional adjustment strategy (42.30 ± 8.16) points. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between military stress and cognitive emotion regulation (P <0.01), and significant negative correlation with perceived social support (P <0.01). However, the correlation between adaptive strategies and stress response factors, family support and non-adaptation strategies, family support and stress response factors were all low-correlated (r <0.2). Prompted, non-adaptive strategies, out-of-home support and stress response between the three significant (P <0.01). Hierarchical regression analysis showed that cognitive emotion regulation strategy could explain 12.3% of variance of variance of military stress response (△ F = 103.15). Among them, the adaptive strategy has a significant negative predictive effect on military stress (β = -0.06, P <0.01). The non-adaptive strategy has a significant positive predictive effect on the stress response of military personnel (β = 0.32, P <0.01). Perceiving social support explained 6.6% of variance in variance in military stress response (ΔF = 51.63). Among them, out-of-home support has a very significant negative predictive effect on military stress (β = -0.22, P <0.01). Mediation effect analysis showed that the mediation effect accounted for 18.6% of the total effect. Adaptive strategies indirectly influence the stress response of military personnel through perceiving social support. CONCLUSIONS: The military stress response is significantly related to perceived social support and cognitive-emotional regulation strategies. Non-adaptive strategies affect military stress responses through perceived social support.