论文部分内容阅读
我国《票据法》实施以来,学术界对《票据法》的有关内容进行了探讨,提出了各自的意见。本文仅就其中的三个问题谈点认识,以求我国票据法的完善。 一、关于利益偿还请求权的法定原因问题 我国《《票据法》第十八条规定:“持票人因超过票据权利时效或者因票据记载事项欠缺而丧失票据权利的,仍享有民事权利,可以请求出票人或者承兑人返还其与未支付的票据金额相当的利益。”
Since the implementation of the “Notes Law” in our country, the academic circles have discussed the relevant contents of the “Notes Law” and put forward their own opinions. This article only talked about one of the three issues, in order to improve our bill method. I. Legal Issues Concerning Claim of Interest Repayments Article 18 of China’s “Notes Law” stipulates: “Bearers still have civil rights because they have been deprived of the rights to negotiable instruments due to exceeding the rights of bills of lapse or due to lack of documented items in the bills, and may request The drawer or acceptor repays the benefit equal to the amount of unpaid bills. ”