论文部分内容阅读
对于四部分类法中别集与总集之间的关系,今人普遍认为:别集是与总集相对而言。但是,通过对“别集”、“总集”术语的产生、概念内涵的演变的考察,可以发现:无论是从《隋志》对文献类目的最初设置,还是从以后目录学著作中的实际著录与集部类目设置来看,在四部分类法中,“别集”是相对“楚辞”而提出,别集起初得名是从“别聚焉,名之为集”而来,不是与“总集”相对而言。所谓“别集与总集相对”不是对四部分类法中别集的定义,形成这种误解的症结在于:一是对“楚辞”类目设置的认识比较含混,二是没有全面考察《隋志》之后的目录学著作因循旧例的著录实际与类目设置。
For the relationship between the other four sets of categories and the total set, today generally believe that: Do not set is relative to the total set. However, by examining the evolution of the connotations of concepts such as “Do not Set ” and “Aggregate ”, we can find that no matter from “Sui Zhi” to the initial setting of the document category or from the later catalog In the four categories of classics, the actual classification of the book and the collection of titles in the collection are as follows: “Do not set ” is relative to “Chu Ci ” and put forward, do not set the initial name is from “Do not gather Yan , Named as set ”, not with “ total set ”relative terms. The so-called “Do not set with the total set of relative ” is not a definition of four sets of class method set, the crux of the formation of this misunderstanding lies in: First, the “Chu Ci ” category set of understanding is rather vague, the second is not A comprehensive examination of “Sui Zhi” after the bibliography of historical examples of the bibliographic actual and category settings.