论文部分内容阅读
美国哲学家诺曼·莱文在其近著《分歧的路径:马克思主义和恩格斯主义中的黑格尔》中,从“马克思主义的去黑格尔化”和“马克思主义的黑格尔化”的双重维度探讨了马克思主义之黑格尔起源的问题。从内容上看,“去黑格尔化”主要是对西方马克思主义哲学家和恩格斯有关黑格尔的话语的一种检讨,“黑格尔化”则主要是在对马克思尤其是青年马克思与黑格尔关系的解读中形成的理论定位。莱文把这两个方面关联并衔接在一起,为人们的研究打开了一个新的学术空间,可是,他又没有精当地处理它们之间的关系,因而很容易遭受质疑。
In his recent book, “The Path of Divergence: Hegel in Marxism and Engelism,” American philosopher Norman Levin translated from “Marxism to Hegelianism” and “Marxist Hague The ”dualization“ of Marx and Engels discussed the origin of Marxism Hegel. From a content point of view, ”going to Hegelianism“ is mainly a review of Western Hegelian Marxist philosophers and Engels’s discourse, ”Hegelianization" is mainly Marx, especially It is the theoretical position formed in the interpretation of the relationship between the young Marx and Hegel. Levin brings these two aspects together and join together to open a new academic space for people’s study. However, he is not easy to handle the relationship between them and is therefore easily questioned.