论文部分内容阅读
如何确立民主政治的正当性所在?如何解释君主主权与人民主权之间的正当性断裂?这个问题如果得不到说明,那么由此引申的一套政治制度便始终面临被另一种“正当性”颠覆的危险。是如自由主义所宣称的个人权利吗?对此,公法学家施米特断然否认:个人权利可以成为社会的基本价值关怀,但对于国家则大可不必。对于施米特来说,国家是政治的实存,政治的正当性意味着良好的统治秩序和决断能力。民主政治要说明自身的正当性,首先必须思索自身的政治含义和政治使命,最终通过民主专政的形式确立正当的统治秩序。
How to establish the legitimacy of democratic politics? How to explain the legitimacy of sovereignty between sovereignty and sovereignty? If this question is not explained, then the set of political system extended from this will always be faced with another Sex "The danger of subversion. Is this the individual rights claimed by liberalism? In this regard, public legal Schmitt categorically denied that individual rights can become the basic values of social care, but not for the country. For Schmitt, the state is the reality of politics, and the legitimacy of politics means a good rule of order and a decisive power. To demonstrate its own legitimacy, democratic politics must first consider its own political and political mission and finally establish a proper order of governance through the form of democratic dictatorship.