论文部分内容阅读
推定与证明责任的关系因推定种类的不同而需辩证分析。不可反驳的法律推定是直接导致实体法律后果的规范;法律推定实际上就是证明责任规则,它直接将证明推定事实不存在的责任分配给受推定不利的一方当事人,而并非免除主张推定事实一方的证明责任;事实推定仅转移提供证据的责任而不会改变证明责任的分配,在实践中需谨慎使用。我国立法应该完善对推定的规定。
The relationship between presumption and burden of proof requires a dialectical analysis due to the different types of presumptions. The irrefutable legal presumption is the norm that leads directly to the legal consequence of the entity. The legal presumption is actually the proof of liability rule. It directly distributes the burden of proving the non-existent fact to a presumptively unfair party instead of exempting one of the parties Proof of liability; de facto presumption of transfer of evidence only to provide the burden of proof will not change the distribution of the burden of proof, in practice need to be used with caution. Our country’s legislation should improve the presumption.