当前司法体制改革背景下公证职能作用发挥不到位,甚至被严重低估,主要体现在三个方面,其一,无论是中央的决策部署、最高法院的推动,还是四川的工作实践,这些实践都重点强调的是人民调解、行政调解、仲裁、行政裁决的作用,客观上都忽视了公证在多元化纠纷解决机制构建中的作用。在公证职能上,基本只强调公证文书,对人民调解协议赋予公证效力,中央对于关于完善多元化纠纷解决机制 Under the current judicial system reform, the function of notary public function is not in place or even seriously underestimated, mainly reflected in three aspects: First, whether it is the decision-making and deployment of the Central Government, the promotion of the Supreme Court, or the practice of work in Sichuan, these practices are all focused The emphasis is on the role of people’s mediation, administrative mediation, arbitration and administrative adjudication, which objectively neglects the role of notarization in the construction of a diversified dispute resolution mechanism. In notarial functions, basically only emphasizes notarization documents and gives notarization to the people’s mediation agreement. The Central Government is in the position of regarding the improvement of the mechanism for the establishment of a pluralistic dispute settlement system