西安市工业碳排放的空间分异特征与驱动因子

来源 :水土保持通报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ouwenliao
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
采用西安市1997—2011年工业能耗数据和2010年各区县单位GDP能耗数据进行了碳排放量的估算,通过STIRPAT模型构建驱动因子分析模型。研究表明:(1)西安市1997—2011年各类碳排放量表现出总体上升的特征。(2)各区县碳排放量、碳排放产值、人均碳排放量、地均碳排放量呈现出明显的空间分异现象。Moran指数显示,西安市各区县碳排放量存在显著地空间正相关性。碳排放量的空间分布特征是:碳排放量较高的区县趋向于和碳排放量较高的区县集聚,碳排放量较低的区县趋向于和碳排放量较低的区县集聚。(3)STIRPAT模型表明:经济发展、人口规模、产业结构和技术水平对碳排放量影响程度不同,其中经济发展对碳排放量增加具有决定作用,产业结构优化对碳排放量增加具有抑制作用。 The carbon emissions were estimated by using industrial energy consumption data from 1997 to 2011 in Xi’an and energy consumption per unit GDP of all districts and counties in 2010, and a driving factor analysis model was constructed through STIRPAT model. The research shows that: (1) All kinds of carbon emissions in Xi’an from 1997 to 2011 show an overall increase. (2) The carbon emissions, the output value of carbon emissions, the per capita carbon emissions and the carbon emissions per capita in all districts show obvious spatial differentiation. The Moran index shows that there is a significant spatial positive correlation between carbon emissions in all districts and counties in Xi’an. The spatial distribution of carbon emissions is characterized by the fact that counties with higher carbon emissions tend to gather with counties with higher carbon emissions and that counties with lower carbon emissions tend to gather with districts with lower carbon emissions . (3) The STIRPAT model shows that economic development, population size, industrial structure and technology have different impacts on carbon emissions. Economic development plays a decisive role in increasing carbon emissions, and industrial structure optimization has an inhibitory effect on carbon emissions.
其他文献
目的评价T型钢板治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的效果.方法35例术前x线片示桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的患者经手术切开复位,以T型钢板内固定治疗. 结果术后X线及功能评估:31例(88.6%)功能
[目的]针对不同分类算法对地物识别结果的差异性导致地表覆盖变化分析难以为城市变化提供参考信息和决策依据问题。[方法]研究以GlobeLand 30标准产品为数据源,结合CA_Markov模型,对郑州地区2000—2020年土地利用变化速度、幅度、程度,以及熵值演变方向等时空变化特征进行分析与模拟预测。[结果](1)2000—2010年,郑州地区人造地表显著增加,湿地、耕地、草地有一定程度的减少,其
目的研究肝炎后肝硬化患者血清一氧化氮(NO)及一氧化氮合酶(NOS)水平的变化.方法实验组:肝硬化患者58例;对照组:正常健康者40例.血清学检测指标:NO、NOS含量、血清丙氨酸氨基