论文部分内容阅读
《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)第6条国内监管与第16条市场准入之间的关系一直是理解GATS文本中的一个重要问题,直接关系到成员方如何在遵守GATS有关贸易自由化义务的前提下,确保服务业的国内监管自主权。通过分析WTO争端解决机构近来裁决的“美国博彩案”的专家组报告和上诉机构报告,作者指出,鉴于服务业的特殊性及成员方在服务贸易发展方面所存在的巨大差异,可以通过对第16条市场准入限制进行严格限定的方式,维护成员方对服务业的国内监管自主权。
The relationship between Article 6 of the GATS domestic regulation and market access to Article 16 has always been an important issue in understanding GATS texts and is directly related to how members are complying with GATS obligations regarding trade liberalization Under the premise of ensuring the service industry’s domestic regulatory autonomy. By analyzing the report of the expert group and the appellate body of the “American gaming case” recently ruling by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, the author points out that in view of the particularity of the service industry and the huge differences in the development of trade in services between the member countries, 16 market access restrictions to strictly limit the way to safeguard members of the domestic service industry regulatory autonomy.