论文部分内容阅读
“房屋中心主义”和“土地中心主义”作为不动产征收立法的两种取向,呈现出不同的价值导引和规范机理。揆诸两大法系不动产征收较为完备国家的立法,“土地中心主义”立法取向贯穿于具体制度的建构和展开中,成为规范逻辑体系之主线。鉴于域外先进经验、土地的特殊属性以及土地与建筑物间关系等因素的考量,我国不动产征收立法应摒弃“房屋中心主义”而践行“土地中心主义”的立法取向,并以此为导引进行方法论维度的展开。
“Housing-centrism ” and “land-centrism ” as the two kinds of orientation of legislation on real property collection, showing different value guidance and normative mechanism. In addition, the legislation of “land-centered doctrine” runs through the construction and expansion of specific systems and becomes the main line of standardizing the logic system. In view of the advanced experience outside the territory, the special attributes of the land and the relationship between the land and the buildings and other factors, the legislation of real property collection in our country should abandon the legislative orientation of “housing centralism” and practice “land centralism” This is the guide to carry out the methodology of the expansion.