现代仲裁制度对国家权力已产生了较强的依赖,司法干预已成为不争的事实并适应了仲裁制度发展的需要。但是,商事仲裁毕竟是有别于司法制度,对其自治本质属性的尊重和存在价值意义的认可,使得司法权力对仲裁活动的干预经历了一个发展过程,即从不干预到过度干预,再发展到有限干预。所谓司法干预,既包括了司法机关对商事仲裁带有限制作用的消极干预,又包括带有保障支持作用的积极干 The modern arbitration system has had a strong dependence on state power. Judicial intervention has become an indisputable fact and has adapted to the needs of the development of the arbitration system. However, commercial arbitration, after all, is different from the judicial system, its respect for the essential attribute of self-government and the existence of the value of the recognition of the judicial power to make arbitration has undergone a development process of intervention, from no intervention to excessive intervention, re-development To limited intervention. The so-called judicial intervention includes not only the judiciary has a restrictive role in the commercial arbitration negative intervention, but also with the active support of the security role of support