论文部分内容阅读
目的探究一般自我效能感与应对方式之间的关系。方法由陕西省某县郊中学高三应届156名被试完成一份由一般自我效能感量表(GSES)和中学生应对方式量表(CSSSMSS)组成的问卷。结果 1农村高三男女生在一般自我效能感上并不存在显著的性别差异(t=-0.13,P>0.05);2在应对方式上,男女生在问题解决(t=-8.96,P>0.05)、寻求支持(t=-2.14,P>0.05)、积极的合理化解释(t=0.39,P>0.05)、忍耐(t=0.04,P>0.05)、逃避(t=0.33,P>0.05)、发泄(t=1.03,P>0.05)和幻想(t=0.62,P>0.05)等各个因子上无显著的性别差异;3一般自我效能感与问题解决存在显著的正相关(r=0.47,P>0.01),与积极的合理化解释同样也存在显著正相关(r=0.39,P>0.01)。即自我效能感高的学生更趋向于采用问题解决和积极的合理化解释的方式,较少采用忍耐、逃避、发泄和幻想等方式。结论一般自我效能感对农村高三学生采取何种应对方式有着一定的预测性。
Objective To explore the relationship between general self-efficacy and coping style. Methods A total of 156 participants from a high school in Shaoxing County of Shaanxi Province completed a questionnaire consisting of General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and Middle School Students Coping Style Scale (CSSSMSS). Results 1 There was no significant gender difference in the general self-efficacy of boys and girls in the junior high school (t = -0.13, P> 0.05). 2 In coping styles, ), Seeking support (t = -2.14, P> 0.05), positive rationalization explanation (t = 0.39, P> 0.05) (T = 1.03, P> 0.05) and fantasy (t = 0.62, P> 0.05) .3 There was a significant positive correlation between general self-efficacy and problem solving (r = 0.47, P> 0.01), there is also a significant positive correlation with positive rationalization (r = 0.39, P> 0.01). That is, students with high self-efficacy tended to adopt problem-solving and positive rationalization of interpretation, with less use of patience, avoidance, venting and fantasy. Conclusion General self-efficacy on the rural high school students to adopt what kind of coping style has some predictability.