论文部分内容阅读
背景 :针灸作为有着自己独特理论指导的古老治疗手段已广泛运用于多种疾病的防治中 ,但是就其对某些疾病的疗效目前还有较大争论。而对临床疗效评价的最佳研究是公认的临床随机对照试验 (RCT) ,故我们对国内针灸界中有影响的《上海针灸杂志》所发表的RCT文章进行了评价研究。目的 :通过《上海针灸杂志》发表的有关防治性临床随机对照试验论文 ,了解目前临床科研设计的方法学现状。方法 :按照EBM标准 ,对 16年《上海针灸杂志》的全部防治性研究进行检索并评价RCTs研究的方法学质量。结果 :RCT (140篇 )和CCT(2 10篇 )仅占防治性研究文章的 18 89% ,且质量存在问题。结论 :严格防治性研究的设计和改进统计方法 ,对提高研究结果的真实性至关重要
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture and moxibustion as ancient treatments with their own unique theories have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of various diseases. However, there is still much controversy about its curative effect on certain diseases. However, the best clinical evaluation of clinical trials is a well-established randomized controlled trial (RCT). Therefore, we evaluated the RCT published in Shanghai Acupuncture and Moxibustion Magazine, which is influential in the domestic acupuncture and moxibustion community. OBJECTIVE: To understand the current status of methodology in clinical research design through “Randomized Controlled Randomized Controlled Papers” published in Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. Methods: According to the EBM standard, the 16-year “Shanghai Acupuncture and Moxibustion Journal” prevention and control of all research and evaluation of RCTs research methodological quality. Results: RCT (140 articles) and CCT (articles 210) accounted for 18.89% of the articles on prevention and control, with quality problems. Conclusions: The design of rigorous preventative research and the improvement of statistical methods are crucial for improving the authenticity of the findings