论文部分内容阅读
目的研究护理干预对于门诊换药室烧伤患者焦虑情绪的作用。方法 82例门诊换药室接受换药的烧伤患者,根据护理方法的不同分为观察组(42例)和对照组(40例)。观察组患者采用护理干预,对照组患者采用常规护理,比较分析两组患者的焦虑情绪、疼痛程度、护理满意度。结果换药前,两组患者的焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);换药后,观察组患者的SAS评分为(42.0±4.5)分,明显低于对照组的(51.2±5.6)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。换药过程中,观察组患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分为(2.10±0.44)分,低于对照组的(3.48±0.65)分。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理满意度评分为(95.3±8.5)分,高于对照组的(87.9±8.1)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对门诊换药室烧伤患者换药全过程采用护理干预有助于减轻患者的焦虑情绪及疼痛感,利于创面的愈合,并且在构建和谐护患关系上具有积极意义,值得推广应用。
Objective To study the effect of nursing intervention on the anxiety of burn patients in dressing change clinic. Methods Eighty-two outpatients in the dressing room were divided into the observation group (n = 42) and the control group (n = 40) according to the nursing method. Patients in the observation group were treated with nursing intervention. Patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing care. The anxiety, pain and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results Before the dressing change, there was no significant difference in SAS scores between the two groups (P> 0.05). After the dressing change, the SAS score of the observation group was (42.0 ± 4.5) points, which was significantly lower In the control group (51.2 ± 5.6) points, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). During dressing change, the visual analog scale (VAS) score of the observation group was (2.10 ± 0.44) points lower than that of the control group (3.48 ± 0.65) points. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction score was (95.3 ± 8.5) points higher than that of the control group (87.9 ± 8.1) points, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention in the whole process of dressing change in dressing change room in outpatient service room helps to reduce the anxiety and pain of the patients, promotes wound healing, and has positive significance in building harmonious relationship between nurses and patients, which is worth popularizing and applying.