如果说“文学史”曾经是20世纪中国学术的一个热门,也许不难得到学界的认同。仅仅一个世纪的时间,我们的文学史学科已有了多么长足的发展!我们哪一个大学的中文系不给学生开设几门文学史课程?我们的教育部门和文学研究单位又曾花费了多少人力物力用于各种文学史的编写?我们已出版的各类文学史著作,据并不完全的统计,总数已突破两千种,而且直至今日,各种类型的文学史著作,还在大量产生着和酝酿着。用“繁荣”乃至“十分繁荣”来形容我们的文学史事业,应该不会遭到多少反对。然而,一个令人不安的事实却是：人们对现行的文学史课程和已有的众多“文学史”并不满意,几乎普遍都认为：文学史课程亟需改革,一部真正理想的中国文学史著作尚未出现…… If “literary history” was once a hot topic in Chinese academic in the 20th century, it may not be difficult to obtain the recognition of the academic circles. In just a century, how well have we been in the history of literary history? What department of Chinese at our university does not offer a few literary history courses to our students? How much manpower did our department of education and literary studies have spent Material resources for the preparation of a variety of literary history? We have published various literary history books, according to incomplete statistics, the total number has exceeded 2,000 kinds, and until today, various types of literary history, is still a large number of With and brewing. How much opposition should be given to describe our literary history as “prosperity” or even “very prosperous.” However, one troubling fact is that people are not satisfied with the current course of literature history and the numerous “history of literature” they already have. It is almost universally believed that there is an urgent need for reform in the course of history of literature and a truly ideal Chinese literature History has not yet appeared ...