论文部分内容阅读
周予同先生有一个说法:“经学的时代结束了,经学史的时代刚刚开始。”虽然说是经学史研究,但周先生及弟子朱维铮先生对于经学基本是否定的态度,这很难说是客观、公允的研究。如果我们今天还是采用这样一种态度,还是周予同、朱维铮的研究方法,可以说是自绝于时代、自绝于学术界,必将走进一条死胡同。姜广辉教授主持的“中国经学思想史”课题研究前后历时十三年,《中国经学思想史》四卷六册终于于2010年出版,受到学术界的极大关注。这项研究一个重要的工作就是为经学正名,为
There is a saying by Mr. Zhou Yutong: “The era of Confucian classics is over, and the era of the history of science has just begun.” Although it is a study of the history of science, it is hard to say that Mr. Zhou and his disciple, Mr. Zhu Weizheng, are basically negative about the study of Confucian classics It is an objective and fair study. If we still adopt such an attitude today, or Zhou Yu Tong, Zhu Weizheng’s research methods can be said to have come to an end in the academic world and will surely enter a dead end. Professor Jiang Guanghui presided over the “history of Chinese classical thought history ” study for about 13 years before and after, “Chinese classical thought history” four volumes of six volumes was finally published in 2010, by the great concern of the academic community. One of the important tasks of this research is to justify the study