论文部分内容阅读
在《国史纲目》一书中,作者承继朱子、钱穆等前贤之志,借鉴现代社会科学精神,尝试建立一种兼具价值根基与理论深度的国史叙事。“精神—秩序”、“观念—制度”的二元互动视角,使之具有文明价值的自觉担当,构成对史学研究碎片化倾向的反拨;而以现代社会科学视角进入对经史典籍的理解,则使之能够以治理典范的转变为中心而梳理出对中国历史演进轨迹的独创性解释。上述两者,分别在“道”、“术”二维中体现出国史书写的新典范意义。如何在贴近华夏文明之道的前提下充分吸收现代研究成果,完善历史书写技艺,同时借鉴经史互证、载道求真的古典学术传统,实现史、论之间的合理平衡,是为新国史书写在知识与价值层面立定自身的关键所在。
In “National History Compendium”, the author inherits Zhu Xi and Qian Mu and other predecessors, borrows the spirit of modern social science and tries to establish a narrative of national history that combines both the value foundation and the theoretical depth. “Spirit - order ”, “concept - system ” interactive perspective so that it has the value of civilized play a conscious role in the history of the fragmentation of the reverse; while the perspective of modern social science into the The understanding of history books enables us to sort out the original explanation of the historical evolution of China by focusing on the transformation of governance paradigms. The above two represent the new paradigm of Chinese history writing in the two dimensions of “Tao ” and “technique ” respectively. How to fully absorb the achievements of modern research under the premise of being close to the civilization of Huaxia and improve the historical writing skills and at the same time draw on the classical academic tradition of seeking mutual truth through history and realizing the rational balance between history and theory is a new The key to establishing itself in knowledge and value is the history of Chinese history writing.