论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果.方法 选取2012年11月至2014年11月普外科收治的腹股沟疝患者60例,将其依据治疗方式不同分为传统疝修补术组30例和无张力疝修补术组30例,比较两组治疗效果.结果 无张力疝修补术组患者下床活动时间和住院时间均低于传统疝修补术组,且尿潴留、阴囊水肿、术后疼痛发生率及复发率均低于传统疝修补术组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果明显,预后良好.“,”Objective To investigate the effect of hernia ring filing tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia clinical effect.Methods 60 patients with inguinal hernia from 2012 November to 2014 November were treated in Department of general surgery patients,according to the different treatment methods are divided into the traditional hernia repair group and 30 cases of tension-free hernia repair group 30 cases,the treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Results No time tension repair of hernia patients out of bed and hospitalization time were lower than the traditional hernia repair group, and urinary retention,scrotal edema,postoperative pain and recurrence rate were lower than that of traditional hernia repair group,the differences were statisticaly significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of hernia ring filing tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia is obvious,the prognosis is good.