论文部分内容阅读
本文以“方正诉宝洁倩体字案”二审法官的裁判思路的梳理切入口,对著作权中的默示许可的规范依据和法律地位进行相关界定,得出默示许可是一种特殊的许可使用权而非利益平衡的工具的结论。遵循这一思路,笔者在文章的第三部分梳理了国内外默示许可的立法和司法实践。并在第四部分对“方正诉宝洁案”中二审法院的裁判思路做了简要评析,认为当中存在默示许可和权利限制两者的混淆,既违背了默示许可的法律特征,也未尊重当事人的意思自治。最后,笔者对默示许可在互联网环境下解决著作权授权困难的作用提出了一些思考。
Based on the review of the refereeing thoughts of the second instance judge in “Fang Zheng v. Proctor & Gamble”, this paper defines the normative and legal status of the implied permission in the copyright, and obtains the implied permission is a special Conclusion of a tool that permits usufruct rather than balance of interests. Follow this line of thought, the author in the third part of the article combing the domestic and international legislation and judicial practice of implied permission. In the fourth part, I make a brief comment on the refereeing ideas of the courts of second instance in the “Founder Proctor and Proctor Case”, believing that there exists confusion between the implied permission and the restriction of rights, which not only violates the legal characteristics of the implied permit but also No respect for the party’s autonomy. Finally, the author puts forward some thoughts on the role of implied license in solving the difficulties of copyright authorization under the internet environment.