论文部分内容阅读
《德意志意识形态》给后世造成的影响之一是,马克思主义与施蒂纳思想是水火不容的,但是无论正统派对批判施蒂纳章节的有意忽视,还是非正统派重新思考施蒂纳学说和影响的努力,都暗示了一个结果:《德意志意识形态》对施蒂纳纯粹否定的方式是颇成问题的,或者说是不成功的。有意思的是,作为马克思主义的创始人之一,恩格斯对施蒂纳的态度和看法并非完全如同《德意志意识形态》一样。从历史来考察,恩格斯独立解读施蒂纳的方式,虽然有自身的不足,但其辩证否定施蒂纳的态度和思考,设定了更为健全合理的原则,并将带来马克思主义与施蒂纳思想关系的建设性重构。
One of the effects of the “German Ideology” on succeeding generations is that Marxism and Stirner’s thought are incompatible with each other. However, no matter whether the Orthodox party criticizes Stirling’s intentional neglect, or the Orthodoxy rethinks Stirden doctrine and Implications for effort all imply that the result is that the “German ideology” is purely a question of, or unsuccessful, in the way of a purely negative version of Stirner. Interestingly, as one of the founders of Marxism, Engels’s attitude and view of Stätner are not exactly the same as the “German ideology.” Examining from history, Engels’s independent interpretation of Stirner’s method has its own inadequacies, but dialectically reject Stiner’s attitude and thinking, setting a more sound and reasonable principle, and bringing Marxism with Shi Constructive Reconstruction of the Relationship between Tina and.