论文部分内容阅读
飞虎队战机是文物吗?据今年9月《解放日报》报道仗义疏财100万元的美籍华人方励出资给中国探险协会,要捞起一架61年前在二战中坠入滇池的P-40飞机,如果打捞成功,它将是现存于世惟一一架飞虎队战机。当年飞虎队队长陈纳德将军的遗孀陈香梅女士听到这个消息都兴奋异常。而当地文物部门却称,战机打捞违反“文物法”。云南省考古研究所认为,二战飞虎队战机是文物,此次打捞未经文物部门同意,中国探险协会也不具备文物挖掘资格,违法。而中国探险协会却举出了几个“举国闻名”的例子:1997年广西猫儿山搜寻、2002年西藏米林发掘,都是二战美机遗骸,谁说过那是文物?他说打捞前曾咨询过国家文物局,对方称战机遗骸是不是文物不好鉴定,这才没与云南的文物部门打招呼。
According to the “Liberation Daily” in September this year, it reported that the Chinese-American Fang Li, who has spent one million yuan in justification and money for money, provided funding to the China Exploration and Development Association to retrieve a P- 40 aircraft, if the successful recovery, it will be the only existing Flying Tigers fighters. When the Flying Tigers Captain Chennault’s widow Ms. Chen Xiangmei heard this news are excited. The local cultural relics department has claimed that fighter recovery violated “heritage law ”. Yunnan Archeology Institute believes that World War II Flying Tigers fighters are artifacts, the salvage without the consent of cultural relics department, China Adventure Association also do not have the elite mining qualifications, illegal. However, the China Adventure Society cited several examples of “famous in the whole country”: the search for Mao’er Mountain in Guangxi in 1997 and the excavation in Milin in Tibet in 2002 were all the remains of the U.S. aircraft of World War II. Who said it was an artifact? Before salvage had consulted the State Administration of Cultural Heritage, the other said the fighter remains is not a bad identification of cultural relics, which did not say hello to the cultural relics department of Yunnan.