论文部分内容阅读
本文报告40例自发性脑出血不同时期同类病人急性期脑内血肿穿刺抽吸和内科传统治疗的疗效对比观察。提示血肿穿刺抽吸组病情和出血量均较内科传统治疗组重和多,应用脱水剂和利尿剂时间短,前者疗效较后者佳,缩短了急性期康复时间。 临床资料 40例,血肿穿刺抽吸组(Ⅰ组),男14例,女6例;内科传统治疗组(Ⅱ组),男7例,女13例。两组年龄基本相近,病情分级Ⅰ组高于Ⅱ组1个等级,出血量Ⅰ组多于Ⅱ组一倍多,其余条件基本相当。选择1～7天内首次脑出血病人,观察时间3～4周。治疗前和后各全面检查一次,确定病情等级和等级转化
This article reports 40 cases of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage at different periods of similar patients with acute intracerebral hematoma aspiration and traditional medical treatment comparison observation. Prompt hematoma aspiration group bleeding and bleeding were more weight and more traditional medicine group, the application of dehydrating agent and diuretic time is short, the former is better than the latter, shortening the recovery time of acute phase. Clinical data of 40 cases, hematoma aspiration group (group Ⅰ), 14 males and 6 females; traditional medical treatment group (Ⅱ group), 7 males and 13 females. The two groups were similar in age, grade Ⅰ was higher than grade Ⅱ in group Ⅰ, bleeding in group Ⅰ was more than double that in group Ⅱ, and the rest were basically the same. Choose 1 to 7 days for the first time patients with cerebral hemorrhage, observation time 3 to 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, a comprehensive examination to determine the level of illness and grade conversion