论文部分内容阅读
2015年的四川富豪被绑架案让法律界对罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪进行了热烈的讨论,在这个网络遍布世界每一个角落的时代,各行各业各种声音层出不穷,理由都十分的充分。有的人认为章某的行为不成立犯罪;有的认为章某就是一个懦夫,用别人的生命换取自己的生命太可恶;有的人很理解章某,认为人性本就自保为首。本文也就这一热门案件略微阐述一下一些观点。本文是从章某应当承担法律责任为起点,质疑大众认可的胁从犯。从章某被绑架的细节分析,从而发现大家有理由期待章某不进行违法行为的可能性。因此,也就是在该绑架案中存在另外一条道路让章某和按摩店服务员生还。
In 2015, Sichuan Regal was kidnapped to allow the legal community to hold a lively discussion on the crime and non-crime. This network has been heatedly discussed in every corner of the world, and voices of various trades and professions emerge in an endless stream for many reasons Full. Some people think that Zhang’s behavior does not establish a crime; some think that Zhang is a coward who lives in exchange for their own life is too hateful; some people are very understanding of Zhang, that the human nature of the self-protection of the first. This article also elaborates some of the views on this hot case. This article is from Zhang should assume legal responsibility as a starting point, questioned the public recognition of threatening criminals. Zhang was kidnapped from the details of the analysis, which found that everyone has reason to expect Zhang do not carry out the possibility of illegal activities. Therefore, there is another way in the kidnapping case that Zhang and massage parlors survived.