以庄子对“辩”的否定为问题来源,进而通过公孙龙的“白马论”以及墨子的提示来探讨辩论的真实性、可行性与有效性。在此过程中,可对“辩”、“真”、“可”、“悖”等古代概念与方法进行哲学探讨。在此基础上,从庄子对于择代逻辑(alternative logics)的构想进行引申,我们可以从现代哲学的角度重新回应庄子为何既否定“辩”又参与“辩”的问题。 Take Zhuangzi’s negation of “defense” as the source of the problem, and then discuss the authenticity, feasibility and effectiveness of the debate through Gongsun Long’s “White Horse Theory” and Mozi’s suggestion. In this process, we can make a philosophical probe into the ancient concepts and methods such as “defense”, “truth”, “” “can ”, “” On this basis, from Zhuangzi’s conception of alternative logics, we can re-answer the question of why Zhuangzi deny both “debating” and “debating” from the perspective of modern philosophy.