在中日冲之鸟争议中,冲之鸟是岩礁还是岛屿的争论是表象,冲之鸟能否拥有专属经济区和大陆架则是本质。大多数学者专注于中日冲之鸟争议的表象,即聚焦于冲之鸟的“岛”“礁”之辨;少数学者则试图直接抓住中日冲之鸟争议的本质来研究。无论从哪一个方面来研究,都涉及一个条约解释方法的运用问题。将该方法运用于上述两个方面的研究,可以使研究结果正当化。通过条约解释方法来研究中日冲之鸟争议,既可以增强我们对冲之鸟主张的说服力,又能给我们某些方法论上的启示。 In the controversy between China and Japan in the red bird, the debate over whether the red bird is a rock or an island is an appearance. Whether or not the red bird owns an exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf is essential. Most scholars focus on the appearance of controversy between China and Japan, focusing on the “island” and “reef” of the Rokinabe. Some scholars try to directly grasp the essence of the controversy between the Riken and China the study. No matter from which aspect to study, involves the application of a treaty interpretation method. Applying this method to the above two aspects can make the research result legitimate. Studying the dispute between China and Japan through the interpretation of treaties can not only enhance the persuasiveness of our hedonic claim but also give us some methodological enlightenment.