作品问世以后,便成了社会的财富,读者有批评的权利;但这种批评决非“终审判决”,作者同样有反批评的权利。“咬文嚼字”也不例外。只有通过正常的批评和反批评,我们才能最终走向科学,走向真理。为此,本刊拟新辟“双通道”一栏,通过编辑部的中介,让批评双方直接对话。当然,批评并不是给名人“上课”,反批评也不应文过饰非,否则,“双通道”难免会“堵塞”的。 After the publication of the work, it became a social asset and the reader had the right to criticize. However, such criticism was by no means “a final ruling” and the author also had the right to oppose criticism. “Bite the word” is no exception. Only through normal criticism and counter-criticism can we eventually move toward science and go to the truth. To this end, the magazine intends to open up a “dual channel” column, through the editorial department of intermediaries, so that critics direct dialogue between the two sides. Of course, criticism does not mean “giving lessons” to celebrities. Nor should anti-criticisms be interpreted in a non-fuss way. Otherwise, “dual access” will inevitably “block.”