论文部分内容阅读
學界在對“秦族族源”以及秦文化的淵源問題追行研討過程中,逐漸形成了“西來說”和“東來說”兩種意見。伴隨着新材料的陸續被發現和研究工作的持續深入开展,目前學界在對既有說法作進一步補充完善的同時,逐漸形成了一些新說法和漸趨統一的新認識。“秦族”與“秦人”概念既有密切聯繫,又有一定差别。“秦族”內涵較爲穩定具體,一般是指嬴秦宗族成員,他們彼此之間存在着或親近或疏速的血缘關係;而“秦人”則是一個動態性的概念,是以秦族爲主導與核心逐漸形成的複合族群共同體,秦人的形成和發展經歷了一個長期動態變遷的過程,不同階段的秦人,其內涵和外延是不同的。秦族以血缘關係爲紐帶,有共同的姓氏;而秦人則以地缘關係爲紐帶,注重族群意識和文化認同。“秦人族源”說法存在歧義,相比之下,“秦族族源”概念則更顯精確。秦族很可能源於東方,但秦文化不屬於東方文化體系。
In the process of pursuing the study of the origin of Qin ethnic group and the origin of Qin culture, the academic circles gradually formed two opinions of “West” and “East”. With the continuous discovery of new materials and continuous and in-depth research, the current academic circles have gradually formed some new ideas and new understandings gradually unifying as the supplement and perfection of the existing ones. “Qin” and “Qin” concept of both close, there are some differences. “Qin” is more stable and specific, generally refers to the Qiong Qin clan members, they exist between each other or close to or speeding the blood relationship; and “Qin” is a dynamic concept, Is a complex ethnic group community dominated by the Qin ethnic group and formed at the core. The formation and development of the Qin people have undergone a long-term dynamic change process. The Qin people at different stages have different connotations and denudations. The Qin ethnic group has the same surname as the blood relationship, while the Qin people regard the geo-relation as the bond and pays attention to ethnic group awareness and cultural identity. “Qin Terran origin ” argument ambiguity, by contrast, “Qin ethnic origin ” concept is more accurate. Qin is likely to originate from the east, but Qin culture does not belong to the oriental cultural system.