论文部分内容阅读
公私融合的身份属性、当下国际关系的结构转型这一背景和多维的双重治理架构决定了主权财富基金的治理的特殊性。“去主权化”不应作为主权财富基金治理的重心,因为将私人投资者作为主权财富基金的行为模板在逻辑上和实践中都是有问题的,而且这将导致忽视主权财富基金成立和运营的经济逻辑和治理的其他向度。在获得国内和国际合法性、商业优势、对成员的声誉产生积极影响,协助成员与利益相关者沟通方面,透明度对主权财富基金的治理发挥了不同程度的作用。但是,透明度依然是一个自我实施的问题,透明度要求不应违背平等和适度的原则,透明度与基金投资的经济动机没有直接的逻辑关联。
The identity of public-private integration, the current context of structural transformation of international relations and the multi-dimensional dual governance structure determine the particularity of the governance of sovereign wealth funds. “Going to Sovereignty” should not be the center of gravity of sovereign wealth funds because the behavioral templates for private investors as sovereign wealth funds are both logically and practically problematic and will lead to the neglect of the establishment of sovereign wealth funds And the economic logic of operations and other dimensions of governance. Transparency has played a variable role in the governance of sovereign wealth funds in gaining domestic and international legitimacy, commercial advantages, having a positive impact on the reputation of members and assisting members in communicating with stakeholders. However, transparency remains a self-enforcing issue. The transparency requirement should not violate the principle of equality and moderation. There is no direct logical connection between transparency and the economic motivation of fund investment.