今天和同学们讲三个问题:第一个问题讲德性是科学的天然品格,第二个问题讲当今科学研究者道德过失解剖,第三个问题讲让科学在道德人手中增殖。在思考这一讲的时候,开始我想,怎么讲呢?讲一讲科学研究者的道德规范,以规范作为内容来讲这个讲座。后来一想啊,讲道德规范实际就是讲了一点道德守则,就是讲了一些科学研究者必须遵守的准则,我觉得这样讲对同学们不太负责任。准则是什么?顾名思义,就是合平标准的规则。科研工作者必须遵守的合乎标准 Today, we talk about three issues with our classmates: The first question speaks of virtue as the natural character of science. The second question tells the anatomy of moral misconceptions of today’s scientific researchers. The third issue is for science to proliferate in the hands of ethical people. When thinking about this talk, I began to think, what should I say? Talk about the scientific ethics of researchers, to regulate this content as a lecture. Later on, ah, ethical practice is to speak a little moral code, that is, some scientific researchers must adhere to the guidelines, I think this is not so responsible for the students. What is the criterion? As the name suggests, it is the standard of peace. Scientific workers must comply with the standards