论文部分内容阅读
在对刑诉结构类型的分类标准和世界刑诉结构三大类型的主要特点进行回顾并与我国现行刑诉结构进行比较研究之后，认为我国新刑诉法所确立的刑诉结构仍以现代职权主义为其基本特征；并认为我国现行刑诉结构内部存在机理不统一，机制不平衡和不协调的冲突。主要表现在不完整的刑事侦查、起诉结构中的职权主义甚至越职权主义因素与完整的刑事审判结构中的当事人主义因素的冲突；以及刑事审判结构中的审问式甚至纠问式因素与对抗制庭审方式改革倾向之间的矛盾。最后针对我国现行刑诉结构的缺陷和运作中存在的问题，提出了较为具体可行的完善性建议。
After reviewing the classification of criminal structure type and the main features of the three types of criminal structure in the world and comparing with the current structure of criminal procedure in our country, it is considered that the structure of criminal procedure established by our country’s new criminal procedure law is still under the modern authority Its basic characteristic is that the existing mechanism of criminal procedure in our country is not uniform, the mechanism is imbalanced and uncoordinated. Mainly manifested in incomplete criminal investigation, prosecutorial structure or even the more authoritarian elements of the integrity of the structure of the criminal trial of the doctrine of the parties in the conflict; as well as the structure of the criminal trial interrogative or even questioning factors and confrontational system Conflicts between Reform Tendencies of Trial Methods. Finally, according to the flaws of the current structure of Criminal Procedure in our country and the existing problems in operation, we put forward some more concrete and feasible suggestions.