论文部分内容阅读
2013年修改后的《商标法》正式引入惩罚性赔偿制度,时隔四年适用概率却极低,该制度在使用问题上显然存在诸多障碍。主要原因是:《商标法》及相关司法解释没有对惩罚性赔偿的特殊构成要件进行规定,法定赔偿严重限制该制度的适用,刑事责任的承担对该制度的适用存在影响。为解决以上问题,本文对“恶意”及“情节严重”的认定标准给出了相应建议,对法定赔偿应否适用惩罚性赔偿进行了分析,针对刑事责任与惩罚性赔偿责任的关系提出了自己的见解。
The amended Trademark Law formally introduced the punitive damages system in 2013, but the probabilities of its application for a period of four years have been very low. There are obviously many obstacles in using the system. The main reason is that the “Trademark Law” and related judicial interpretations do not stipulate the special components of punitive damages. Statutory compensation severely limits the application of the system. The assumption of criminal responsibility has an impact on the application of the system. In order to solve the above problems, this article gives some suggestions on the criteria of “malice” and “serious circumstance”, and analyzes whether punitive damages should be applicable to statutory damages. In view of the criminal responsibility and punitive damages Relationship made their own opinion.