论文部分内容阅读
目的 :评估龚氏非文字智力测验 (GTNI)在一般汉族儿童中使用的实证效度。方法 :对 1-5年级 6-12岁男女各 60名小学生施测GTNI和中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表 (C -WISC)。结果 :GTNI的离差标准分 (DSS)与C -WISC言语智商 (VIQ)、操作智商 (PIQ)和全量表智商 (FIQ)相关系数依次是 0 61、0 64、 0 74,等级一致率分别为 46 7%、 3 8 3 %、 46 7%。约有 10 %DSS等级高于或低于智商两个或两个以上等级。智商中等以下 /以上水平时 ,半数以上DSS等级高于 /低于对智商等级。以区间DSS± 10估计VIQ、PIQ和FIQ准确率分别达 66 7%、 5 8 7%、 64 2 %。结论 :GTNI有较好的同时效度 ,可替代C -WISC用于一般汉族儿童的团体比较 ,但用做智力障碍的临床诊断时需慎重 ,用于筛查时亦应警惕假阴性
PURPOSE: To assess the empirical validity of the Gonzalez’s Non-Writer Intelligence Test (GTNI) in the use of general Han children. Methods: Sixty primary and secondary school pupils aged 6-12 in the age group 1-5 were enrolled in the GTNI and C-WISC. Results: The correlation coefficients between GTQ and VIQ, PIQ and FIQ were 0 61,0 64 and 0 74 respectively 46 7%, 383%, 46 7%. About 10% DSS level above or below IQ two or more levels. IQ below the middle level / above, more than half of the DSS level above / below the IQ level. The accuracy of VIQ, PIQ and FIQ was estimated to be 66.7%, 58.7%, 64.2%, respectively, using the interval DSS ± 10. CONCLUSIONS: GTNI has good concurrent validity and can be used as an alternative to C-WISC for group comparison in general Han children. However, it should be used with caution in clinical diagnosis of mental retardation. False negatives should also be used when screening