论文部分内容阅读
(一)自1984年何鼎富同志的《期刊学刍议》一文发表以来,据不完全统计,到1988年11月末,在国内各种期刊上发表的专门研究文献已达10多篇。对此,有的同志颇不以为然,并认为:图书情报理论研究中有一种病态的“求新”现象,表现之一是把图书馆内部技术工作也称之为“学”,如期刊学。从根本上否认了期刊学的存在,与学术界的总方向似乎有一种反“求新”的现象。判断一门学科是否存在,学术界公认的主要判断标志是该门学科有没有自己的独特的研究对象和研究内容,有没有形成一套本学科所特有的研究方法,建立起一个较完整的研究方法体系。本文试图在期刊学的研究方法体系方面进行初步探索,以求专家教正。
(1) Since 1984, when Comrade He Dingfu was published on “Journal Studies”, according to incomplete statistics, by the end of November 1988, more than 10 specialized research papers were published in various journals in China. In this regard, some comrades quite disapprove of it and think that there is a morbid “novelty” phenomenon in the research of library and information science. One of the manifestations is that the technical work in the library is also called “learning”, such as journal study. From the fundamental denial of the existence of journals, and academic circles seem to have a general direction of “anti-innovation” phenomenon. Judging whether a discipline exists, the main judging mark recognized by academia is whether the discipline has its own unique research object and content, whether it forms a set of research methods unique to this discipline, and establishes a more complete study Methodology. This article attempts to tentatively explore the methodology of journals study, in order to teach experts to correct.