论文部分内容阅读
在刑法学界内,网络游戏外挂引发的定罪问题主要集中于侵犯著作权罪、破坏计算机信息系统罪与非法经营罪之间。本文从对比网络游戏与单机游戏的经营模式出发,阐明外挂行为侵害的法益是网络游戏运营商的经济利益,并在网络背景下解释刑法第276条中的“破坏”和“生产经营”的涵义,结合刑法的谦抑性,最终以破坏生产经营罪作为严重侵害运营商经济利益的部分外挂行为的定性选择。
Within the circle of criminal jurisprudence, the criminal conviction problems triggered by the online game plug-in mainly focus on the crime of copyright infringement, the crime of sabotaging the computer information system and the crime of illegal business operation. This article starts from comparing the operation modes of online games and stand-alone games, clarifies that the legal interest of the external games is the economic benefit of the online game operators, and explains the “destruction” and “production and operation” of Article 276 of the criminal law in the network context ", Combined with the modest and restrained nature of the criminal law, ultimately to the crime of sabotaging production and operation as a serious violation of the economic interests of operators part of the qualitative choice of plug-in behavior.