论文部分内容阅读
依现在林谦三对“之 为调名制”的理解方式 ,中国音乐确实宜采用“之调名制”系统。但林谦三对“之 为调名制”的理解方式有误 ,且与事实不合。由西乐界仍多主张 (应无理由被采用的 )“为调名制”来观察 ,也可见林谦三对“之 为调名制”的理解方式 ,与古人不合。依正确的“之 为调名制”及“声调”定义来论 ,则中国音乐宜采用 (已采用了 )“为调名制”系统。
According to the present three ways in which Lin Qian understands “the name system,” Chinese music should indeed adopt the “name system” system. However, Lin Qian three pairs of “the name system” understand the wrong way, and the fact does not fit. Observed by the Western music industry is still more (should be no reason to be adopted) “for the name system” to observe, but also see Lin Qian three “for the name system” way of understanding, and the ancients. According to the correct definition of “Tune Name System” and “Tone Definition”, Chinese music should adopt the “Tune Name System” (adopted).