论文部分内容阅读
徐进在2013年1月10日的“东方网”中撰文称,据《劳动报》报道,荣宝斋(上海)拍卖有限公司举行的第一场拍卖会,就碰到了“搅局者”。持2998号竞投牌号的周峰和翟韶均以3300万元的总价拍下两幅画作,却拖延一年迟迟不付款,最终被荣宝斋告上法院。根据起诉书,荣宝斋要求解除双方的拍卖关系,撤销买卖交易,同时判令周峰和翟韶均赔偿佣金、保险费、利息等各项损失1238万余元。周峰和翟韶均并没有出现在庭审中,代理人表示,愿意继续履行拍卖合约。曾经委托江苏的一家公
Xu Jin wrote in the article “Eastern Net” on January 10, 2013 that, according to the “Labor” report, the first auction held by Rong Bao Zhai (Shanghai) Auction Co., Ltd. By". Zhou Feng and Yan Feng, both holding the No. 2998 bid, photographed two paintings for a total price of 33 million yuan. However, they delayed the payment for one year without delay and were finally reported to the court by Rongbao Zhai. According to the indictment, Rong Baozhai requested the dissolution of the auction relationship between the two parties and the cancellation of the sale and purchase. At the same time, Zhou Feng and Yan Fang were ordered to make compensation for the losses of 12.38 million yuan in commissions, insurance premiums, and interest. Zhou Feng and Yan Jun did not appear in the trial, and the agent stated that he is willing to continue to perform the auction contract. Once commissioned a public company in Jiangsu