论文部分内容阅读
本文报告我院从1987年1月至1995年12月使用B型超声和静脉肾盂造影(IVP)诊断,并经手术及病理证实的泌尿系结石186例,就两种检查结果进行比较,并分析各自的优缺点.临床资料和方法一、一般资料本组186例泌尿系结石均经B超和IVP检查,并经手术、病理证实.其中肾结石83例,输尿管结石78例,膀胱结石25例,男102例,女84例,年龄11～72岁.二、仪器和方法1.B超使用ALOKA SSD-620,探头频率3.75MHz.按周氏方法受检者均先取俯卧位,从腰背部双肾区作矢状切面和冠状切面细致探
This article reports from January 1987 to December 1995 in our hospital using B-mode ultrasound and IVP diagnosis, and 186 cases of urinary calculi confirmed by surgery and pathology, the two test results were compared and analyzed Their own advantages and disadvantages of clinical data and methods A general information 186 cases of urinary stones in this group were B-and IVP examination, and confirmed by surgery and pathology, of which 83 cases of kidney stones, 78 cases of ureteral stones, bladder stones in 25 cases , Male 102 cases, female 84 cases, aged from 11 to 72. Second, instruments and methods 1.B super use ALOKA SSD-620, the probe frequency 3.75MHz. According to the method of week subjects were taken prone position, from the lower back Kidney area for sagittal section and coronal section meticulous exploration