论文部分内容阅读
本文通过《象山先生全集》“书”卷1至卷17,“语录”卷34与卷35两部分的校勘,发现该本保留避宋庙讳之处颇多,不但进一步肯定了家藏本为与荆门州学本有渊源关系的明刊本,同时印证了家藏本《象山先生全集》的文本是上承宋代刻本,与传世其他明刊本属别一系统.其文本价值远远高于其他传世的明刊本.此外,通过“书”卷1至卷17,“语录”卷34与卷35两部分的校勘,得知正德本虽然在明刊本中刊行较早,但并非善本.道光三年本虽小有瑕疵,但所据底本可信,校勘质量颇高.而中华书局刊锺哲点校本不但失校之处甚多,且轻出己意,改易原文.此外,家藏本与中华书局锺哲点校本不同之处,大都以家藏本为可从或可通,可见中华书局锺哲点校本难称善本.本文可为《象山先生全集》“书”卷1至卷17,“语录”卷34与卷35两部分提供一个现阶段最可信的文本。
Through the collation of the complete works of Mr. Xiangshan, Volumes 1 to 17, and the Quotations of Volumes 34 and 35, it is found that there are many taboo places to keep the Song Temple, which not only affirmed further The text of this book, which is closely related to Jingmen Prefecture, confirms that the text of “The Complete Works of Mr. Xiangshan”, a collection of books by the family collected in the collection of the Song dynasty, is a separate system from other historical documents handed down.Its text value is much higher than In addition, through the collation of the two parts of Volume 1 to Volume 17, the quotations of Volume 34 and Volume 35, it is found that although this book was published earlier in the Ming period, it is not Rare books .Tao three years, although small flawed, but based on the authentic creations, collaterals of high quality.While Zhonghua Book Company Zhong Zhe point school not only lost a lot of places, and turned out to change the original text.Moreover, It is difficult to say Zhongzhong School of Zhonghua Book Company can hardly find a rare book.This essay is entitled “Complete Works of Mr. Xiangshan”, “Book” Volume 1 Volume 17, “Quotations” Volumes 34 and 35 provide one of the most credible texts at this stage.