论文部分内容阅读
生态学的论证应当重视Zohary(1959,1960)反对野生六棱大麦(H.agriocrithon)是野生植物的观点。因为野生六棱大麦不能很好适应“自体种植”,只能在人们耕种的土地上才能保存下来,而且大麦属的所有野生种,都是中央小穗结实,侧小穗退化的异穗状花序;如芒麦草(H.jubatμm),地中海大麦(H.gμssoneanμm)和鼠大麦(H.mμrinμm)等全是二棱大麦。此外,已如前述,显性的野生型是二棱大麦。Nevski(1941)指出,野生二棱大麦在向缩短生育期和向什草性发展,以及侧小穗进一步退化的趋势等方面,达到了比栽培大麦更
The ecological argument should take into account the notion that Zohary (1959, 1960) opposes wild H.agriocrithon as a wild plant. Because wild hexagonal barley is not well adapted to “self-cultivation,” it can only be preserved on cultivated land, and all wild species of the genus Barley are all distinct spikes of the central spikelet, ; Barley such as H.jubatum, H. g..ssoneanum and H.mμrinum were all two-rowed barley. In addition, as mentioned above, the dominant wild type is two-rowed barley. Nevski (1941) pointed out that the wild two-rowed barley to shorten the growing period and to the grass-like development, as well as the further degradation of the side spike trend, reaching more than the cultivation of barley