论文部分内容阅读
《秘书》分别于2014年第12期和2015年第3期发表的《对“若干意见”行文的再思考——意见文种使用规范探究》[1](以下简称“《再思考》”)和《也谈“若干意见”行文的规范性——兼与栾照钧先生商榷》[2](以下简称“《商榷》”)两篇文章,对“若干意见”的行文现象进行了探讨。经过重新审视和反复交流,我们试对此讨论作以下小结。一两点已达成的共识《再思考》关于“用‘若干意见’行文不符合公文标题的语法规范”的表述和《商榷》提出的商榷
“Secretary” in 2014 No. 12 and No. 3 in 2015, respectively, issued a “right” a number of opinions “rethinking of the language - the use of speculative language inquiry” [1] (hereinafter referred to as “ Several Opinions ”,“ Normative Texts - Discussion with Mr. Luan Zhaojun ”[2] (hereinafter referred to as the“ ”“) ”two articles,“ a number of opinions ”The text of the phenomenon were discussed. After a re-examination and repeated exchanges, let us try the following summary of the discussion. Consensus reached at one or two points “Rethinking” on the expression of “grammatical norms” that “a number of opinions are not in line with the official title” and “deliberation”